After Christmas 2004 - 2005, we started a new project. The project should have carried us through the second term up until the Easter break. This time it was self-directed - we set the focus and the agenda and develop the ideas ourselves.
I started to look at interaction. Interaction with, and between, objects and people in and around our world is central to our existence. It is a marker for all societies that have ever been and dominates every aspect of our lives. Science, language, math, religion and more all explore relationship and interaction.
I had plenty of ideas but nothing to work with visually - that was why I eventually ditched Interactions and changed my tack a little.
These are the entries for my course diary from the first, ill fated, project.
Each entry will be marked by a line of dashes. They are in chronological order.
———————-
I want to look at interaction, but it’s such a broad subject and I’m not sure where to start - I will need to fix my ideas soon thought…
———————-
Cubists appear to have approached interaction from an artistic/aesthetic perspective - they explored relationship between features and objects and concentrated on still-lifes, and static images
Futurists went on though to look at movement and the relationship of positions of an object or objects in motion
———————-
BLUEPRINT magazine - Architecture, Design, Culture
I love flicking through this magazine. Designers and Architects use space and objects, light and colour to create such amazing relationships between objects.
Design and architecture also walk a fine line (often argued) between aesthetics and function.
I think art has lost a sense of function. It seems to me to very rarely understand why it is or quite how it got there.
‘Infinity is not freedom’ - too much choice can create stasis. Maybe design and architecture, because they also have to appeal to function (as well as aesthetics) have a focus that art can lack - British design is considered some of the best in the world (Dyson) but where is british art? Globally art seems to be lost - gone is the inertia from Modernism and we’re left floundering.
Perhaps I’m wrong - and I’ve gone off the point - But I still love design’s sense of interaction and relationship. (it’s presentation is also five-star - but that’s another blog.)
———————-
Richard Mitzman (Blueprint, Dec ‘04 - p40)
A dentist who also works as an architect - specifically dentist’s surgeries! - Amazing interaction between space and objects - sense of function. Architecture, in this case, is interaction by design, considered, researched.
———————-
Jeppe Hein (Frieze, March ‘04, issue 81 - p88)
Structures and installations react to human presence in their space.
Hein - influenced by Olafur Eliasson. . . .
One piece; Bear the Consequences - shoots flame from the wall when you enter the room. The flame gets larger and more fierce the closer you get.
Autonomy marks Hein’s work. Installations reach and relate without outside controls - but implies that the person who triggered it is responsible for it’s (often unpredictable) actions, not Hein.
———————-
Olafur Eliasson
Homepage
Tate Biography
———————-
Conrad Shawcross
Homepage
Further Info
Continuum
———————-
Victor Burgin
Taken from ‘Shocks to the system’: Social and political issues in recent British art from the Arts Council Collection
“one of the reasons I dropped painting, and turned to photography and writing, was to establish a link between the work on the gallery walls and the everyday environment beyond those walls. The use of photo-text was a way of establishing a continuity of languages between the cultured tones of ‘high art’ and the vernacular of the ‘mass media’. I see the culmination of that initiative, at least my own clearest statement of it, in the 1979 Possession poster project. The posters went up in the streets Newcastle, and on the interior walls of the Hayward gallery (for the 1977 Hayward Annual) without any concession whatsoever to the gallery setting. The museum was treated as nothing more than an extension of the space of the street. Modernism’s ’separatist politics’ had turned the museum into a sort of church, a place of worship of saintly relics and a sanctuary from everyday life. For me that poster work was a symbolic ‘ground clearing’…”
from ‘Between’ Blackwell/ICA
Victor Burgin uses text in his images to underling and remark upon the scene being depicted - the link is made with Conceptual art to which Burgin is a contemporary. The work in Shocks to the system are dated 1979
———————-
Calum Colvin
homepage
Calum Colvin’s work could argueably be considered a critique of orchestration in photography. Images that are clear only from one viewpoint. We all construct pictures, from asking people to move so we can see them better (or not at all!) to the use of telescopy and compositional techniques - but Calum Colvin in his work (esp.earlier work) goes one step further - totally constructing a vista that is only fully coherent from one point of view.
He also uses stories and theories as the basis for his work - his representation of them makes me think that they are metaphorical - like using past mistakes to guard against future ones. . A true story teller - real story-telling.
more complex images possibly become allegorious.
Use of latin in Seven Deadly Sins and Psuedologica Fantastica is similar to the idea of using morse code - recognisable as communication yet still obscure. “It’s plain to see it’s trying to speak.”
Use of reflection - mirrors - like an inversion (’inversion of colour and metaphor, begs questions.’)
I need a metaphor (for this project) a depiction for the ideas I want to explore.
———————-